Special Terms Explanation
Diabetes:
A chronic
disorder of the glucose (sugar) metabolism. The body's ability
to control (optimize) the blood sugar level is affected.
Diabetes is a leading cause of death in the
"civilized" countries. The ruling medical dogma
explains it to be caused by inadequate (insufficient) production
or use (efficacy) of insulin. Insulin is the hormon that
prevents the blood sugar exceeding a certain optimal level. The
blood sugar is the energy supply for the body. An optimal blood
sugar level is as important for the body, its cells and organs,
as an optimal electric voltage is important for every electric
or electronic equipment.
The ruling medical dogma doesn't
explain the causes of the diabetic disorder, and doesn't offer a
curing therapy. Diabetes is worldwide one of the biggest
businesses of the "modern medicine" and of the
pharmaceutical industry.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Civilization condition:
Most
of the today's widespread chronic diseases (ailments,
conditions) didn't exist, before the so called "modern
civilization" was developed. Even in former high
civilizations - like the old Egypt, Greece, Roman, Chinese,
Indian, Maya civilizations - the "modern civilization
diseases" were unknown. These populations were very
healthy, their skeletons, their bodies and their dentitions were
beautiful and well proportioned. They had the knowledge how to
maintain a natural health of their population including healthy,
undegenerated offspring. This knowledge still is available - but
kept as a top secret, protected by neglecting the truth or cover
it with a smoke by "targeted disinformation".
The "modern medicine"
claims to have increased the life expectancy. But this is only
half the truth. Half of the increase comes from a better birth
hygiene. If one of two dies shortly after birth, and the other
one reaches 80, the statistical average is 40. If both survive, the
modern medicine claims a 100 % increase of life expectancy!
The
other half of "increased" life expectancy too doesn't come from more health. The "modern
medicine" doesn't bring more health into the population.
Because healthy people of any age wouldn't need a doctor, nor a
pharmacy, nor a "health insurance".
This other half of "more" life expectancy comes from the
biased efforts of the "modern medicine",
focussed on keeping ill people longer alive. Not on curing them!
This would be "contraproductive!
It's the ill but alive people that represent the
fertile field, from which the complete system of the "modern
medicine", doctors, clinics, pharmaceutical industries,
pharmacies and insurances permanently are harvesting their
considerable incomes. The chronic civilization conditions are
the indispensable preconditions of their economic existance and
prosperity. That's why they defend them with similar efforts, as
the oil industry is defending the access to their oil resources.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Diabetes
Type I:
Before, this type was called "Juvenile
Diabetes". Because this type occured only to children. This
type of diabetes needs from the beginning of the disease to be
on insulin, because the natural insulin production in the body has
decreased. As we could find out, it's mostly caused by measures
of a physician!
The "modern medicine", not really
understanding the reactions of the natural immune system in
cases of acute defense (e.g. producing fever or an inflammation,
that create better conditions to fight the "aggressor"
successfully down) - this "modern medicine" fights the
immune system and it's defense reactions down!! Mostly, it's
such a physician's medication of "antibiotics" or
antipyretic drugs during an infection or inflammation, that
produces some weeks or months later a "Diabetes Type
I".
The new name had to be invented, because the
"modern medicine" had produced a considerable mess: By
increased efficacy of medication against the acute defense
measures of the immune system, the "modern medicine"
succeeds now to produce "juvenile diabetes" even in
adults. So, how to tell now a 45 years old man that he has got a
"juvenile diabetes"? To avoid disagreeable questions,
how this could have happened, isn't it better to tell him, from
now on for the rest of his life to "live with a diabetes
type I"?
[back to the original passage click here] |
Diabetes Type
II:
Originally, this type of diabetes was called
"Diabetes of Adults". But the mess wasn't less than
with "juvenile diabetes" - more
and more children got such a "diabetes of adults".
Before, the "diabetes of adults" was said to be a
"disease of old age". But then, younger adults got it
too. And now children! How to explain to a 15 years old girl
that she has got a disease of old age? To avoid again
disagreeable questions, isn't it better to tell her, that from
now on for the rest of her life she has to "live with a
diabetes type II"?
In truth, this type of diabetes is
caused by the today's denaturated and not man-appropriate
feeding habits. Especially the oversupply with animal protein,
worsened by consumption of a lot of sugar and white flour
products (junk food!), are the main causes of diabetes type II.
It's no
longer surprising that a high protein consumption is
recommended by nutritional and medical "experts". It's
the best way to maintain most of the chronic civilization
ailments (the "oil resource of the modern medicine"), and especially to make diabetes type II
"incurable"!
[back to the original passage click here] |
Later Diabetes
Consequences:
They are practically the same, the later
consequences of diabetes type I and II. Because they are less
the consequences of the diabetic diseases - they are mainly the
later consequences of the usual diabetic diet. It's the protein
oversupply of this diet, that causes most of these very serious
secondary diabetic ailments:
Losing one's eyesight, losing legs
by amputation because of diabetic gangrene, losing sensation
because of diabetic nerve degeneration, suffering from kidney
failure and forced for several hours of dialysis twice per week
(dialysis is one of the fastest growing medical businesses),
embolism, stroke, heart attack because of complete obliteration
of blood vessels ...
[back to the original passage click here] |
Medical
secrets:
There are so many
medical secrets - it would need books to describe them. Much of
them are about causes of diseases. Some of them even the
physicians don't know, because they weren't instructed about
during their studies, despite the knowledge would be available
in books, scientific studies and in some people knowing about
(and partially being squelched and persecuted because of that).
This is valid for the main causes of most
of the chronic civilization diseases (otherwise the population
wouldn't be so ill in such a high percentage), including the
causes of diabetes I and II, leukemia, hypertension, most cancer
types, tooth decay and malposition of teeth.
Other
"medical secrets" become revealed under the physicians eyes:
E.g. if a patient, suffering from a disease said
"incurable" by the medical doctrine, gets cured from
it. If being a true scientist, the doctor should become curious,
trying to find out how this happened, perhaps it could cure his
other "incurable" patients too. But, as an obedient
member of his medical association and of the ruling medical
doctrine, he will develop doubts on what he has seen, and e.g.
say: "Cured from diabetes? Impossible! If cured, it wasn't
a true diabetes before. Because if it would have been a true
diabetes, it wouldn't have been cured, because diabetes is
incurable!".
As the German physisist and Nobel Prize winner
Max Planck said, wrong doctrines survive 50 years, until
relieved, because not only the respective professors, but also
their students must die out before ...
This new, diabetes curing
therapy I had discovered in 1977. Says, we have to wait until
about the year 2027, until this therapy will be tought to the
students of medicine, enabling them to prevent many cases (by
avoiding medical faults), and to cure most of their diabetic I
and II patients. But this too would mean (and it's another
medical secret), that a much smaller total number of physicians
would be needed and able to exist from the reduced number of ill
patients ...
[back to the original passage click here] |
Auto-immune
disease:
Condition caused when the body produces
antibodies to its own substances. Diabetes type I is one of
them, and there are many others. The mechanism is known and
published.
But not much research is done on the predonditions
that lead to such a self-destruction. As we know by practical cases
studies, it can be caused by unbiological medication, especially
during acute diseases with fever or inflammation. This disables
the immune system (as, in case of fire, you would close the
water pipe for the fireguards because they make everything wet
and a lot of noise).
As a consequence,
now the viruses can
penetrate the cell membrane, and use the cell's genetic program to
multipy themselves. The immune system - if still partially
functional - recognizes such viruses breeding cells and destroys
them. This is called "auto-immune-disease".
In case
the "modern medicine" succeeds fully to disable the
immune system by the high efficacy of their wrongly designed
drugs, the result is an
"Auto-Immune-Deficiency-Syndrom". The abbreviation of
this is AIDS. To argue that a virus should be its cause (still
this mere assertion is waiting for a true scientific proof), reminds rather on
the method "Stop thief!", to draw the attention off
from the true causes.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Pancreas:
Glandular organ
that secretes digestive enzymes and hormons. The "islets of
Langerhans" inside the pancreas contain alpha-2-cells,
which produce the hormon glucagon, and the beta-cells (B-cells),
which produce the hormon insulin. Both hormons together control
and maintain an optimal blood sugar level. If the level is
lowering under the optimum, some glucagon is produced, causing
the liver to change some of the stored glycogen into glucose
(blood sugar). If the blood sugar is elevating above the
optimum, some insulin is produced, to cause the liver to store
some of the glucose as glycogen.
In many of children and young
people, a chronic inflammation of the pancreas has taken place.
This can cause many different complaints and diseases. It's one
of the reasons why it's more difficult to cure a diabetes type
I. The main cause of a chronic pancreas inflammation is the
common denaturated civilization nutrition, especually if it
contains a lot of protein and a lot of sugar (as the usual
"junk food" does).
Chronic pancreas inflammation can be cured by a natural,
man-appropriate, undenaturated nutrition ("civilized origin
nutrition").
[back to the original passage click here] |
Insulin:
The hormon
insulin controls the blood sugar level "from the upper
side": If the level elevates above the optimum, some
insulin is produced, bringing the level back to the optimum.
Diabetes
means an uncontrolled elevation of the blood sugar level because
of an insufficient control from this "upper side".
This can reach a level where the patient becomes unconscious
(diabetic coma), that can end deadly. The mechanisms (and their
medical explanations and doctrines about) are different. The
most common explanation is "lack of insulin".
That's
why - in cases of diabetes type I - insulin injections are
taken, and why in cases of diabetes type II sulfonyl urea are
given, to spur on the B-cells to produce more insulin (until
they become exhausted, degenerated an finally also insulin has
to be injected).
But this doctrine has its flaws. Already in 1981, 4
years after I had discovered this diabetes curing therapy, Dr. Jesse
Roth (Bethseda, Maryland, USA) found the insulin receptors in
the cell membranes, and he discovered that in diabetic patients
it's the receptors only have limited functioning - many of
the patients had even more insulin in their blood than healthy people
have. By a diet "rich in fibres, low in calories" he
could normalize the receptors and the natural blood sugar
control of these patients.
It's not only
"hyperglycemia" (too high blood sugar level), that
characterizes diabetes. It's also "hypoglycemia" (too
low blood sugar level). In truth, it's an impaired blood sugar
control from both sides. Like a drunk driver sways from one side
of the road to the other, the blood sugar level of the diabetic
oscillates between too much high and too much low. The reason is
not so much a limited insulin production. The main reasons are
two others:
- it's a wrong nutrition, with fast resorbable
carbohydrates in it (refined white flour, soluble sugars, and
foodstuff containing those); and
- it's a retarded transport of
the insulin from the B-cells in the pancreas to the insulin receptors in the cell membranes.
The cause of the transport
retardation is an oversupply with protein and refined carbohydrates,
partially stored as mucopolysaccharides in all tissues, in the
cell membranes, in the basal membrane of the blood vessels and
the capillaries, and in the interstitium (the space between the
body's cells and the blood capillaries).
By all that, the way
from the B-cells into the blood, and from the blood to the
insulin receptors in the cell membranes, becomes loger up into 15
of normal (according to findings of Prof. Dr. med. Lothar Wendt). By that,
the transport time squares 15 x 15 = 225.
Now it's easy to
understand, why the blood sugar control runs out of control. If
the body orders some insulin because of a higher blood sugar
level, the production starts immediately. If normally it takes
about one minute, until the first insulin reaches receptors and
lowers the blood sugar level, now this can take up to 225
minutes. That's several hours!!! In all that time, the blood
sugar level goes on elevating, and the body orders more insulin
production. When - after all that time - the first insulin
reaches the receptors, the blood sugar level starts lowering.
But now, there are other huge quantities of insulin still on the
way. The more of it reaches insulin receptors, the more the
blood sugar level becomes low, much too much low. That's why
"hypoglycemia" is the other side of diabetes.
[back to the original passage click here]
|
Virus:
A virus is a unit of
nucleic acids with a protein coat, that can stay inactive (e.g.
crystallized) but infectious for many years, and that's able to
reproduce and multiply, by using the protein- and
nucleic-acid-synthesizing ability of living cells (of plants,
animals or bacteria) to replicate itself. There are many
different types of viruses existing, and they can change their
structure from generation to generation. The immune system of
the body is able to develop antibodies against most of them and
to neutralize them. Partially this needs the full efforts and
arsenal of the immune system, including a higher body
temperature (fever).
[back to the original passage click here] |
Bacteria:
Bacteria
are unicellular organisms, able to replicate itself by dividing
into two, four, eight etc.. There are many very different
bacteria, some living with oxygen, others without oxygen, some
of them can cause infectious diseases, and many more types of
bacteria are undispensable for human and other organisms health
and for the fertility of the soil.
In case of an infection from
pathogenic (diseases causing) bacteria, the immune system of the
body has a complete, well-armed army to defend itself against
the aggression.
The "modern medicine" is thinking to
support the organism in case of bacterial infection by
antibiotics. But this is a double-edged sword with serious
side-effects. E.g. the killed pathogenic bacteria release their
endotoxines into the body, producing a heavy intoxication. Too,
the body's immune system can be impaired as well by antibiotics
- and if some of the bacteria are resistant to the antibiotics,
the body remains exposed to their infection without defense.
Another consequence of antibiotic therapy is the destruction of
the natural intestinal bacterial flora too, that normally
protects the intestine against foreign bacteria and that
provides the organism with protein and vitamins (e.g. Vitamin B
12). After the intestine remains unprotected, foreign and
partially pathogenic bacteria settle there, causing chronic
inflammation, diseases and vitamin deficiency.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Cell
membranes:
The membranes of cells are their
"outer skin" - protecting them against their
environment, but at the same time serving for communication and
exchange of water, oxygen, carbo-oxygen, glucose, protein, fatty
acids, enzymes, minerals, trace elements and many other
substances. The cell membrane is the place where the insulin
receptors are sitting. In case of protein oversupply, this
membrane thickens too - and the insulin receptors are more and
more covered by a protein layer.
That's the reason why the
insulin efficacy reduces more and more. Increasing the insulin
production artificially or injecting insulin is not a very
intelligent solution of this problem. The right measure is to
reduce the protein supply, to allow the membrane to normalize
and the receptors to become again functional.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Fever:
Fever is one
of the most effective measures of the organism to defend against
any viral or bacterial aggression in a "total war". By
a higher body temperature
the virus becomes weakened, and the body's defense army and
their weapons (e.g. antibodies) become more effective. It's
similar with bacteria. At the same time, the body is liquefying
parts of the connective tissues, to eliminate everything that's
not needed - including stored protein from former oversupply. The
hydrogen ion concentration is shifting to acidulous, supporting
the immune system's defense measures.
If an antibiotic or
antiphlogistic medication is given in this situation, all these measures of the
body, which had been optimized during millions of years of
evolution, get stopped all of a sudden. This is a very serious
intervention, and a main cause of later appearing chronic
conditions, within them diabetes type I and leukemia.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Inflammation:
While
fever means a "total war", an inflammation is a local
combat. A part of the defense army is sent to the place where an
infection has happened. They encircle the enemies, neutralize
their poisons, and the body's macrophages immediately eat the enemies
up. If necessary, the macrophages even sacrifice themselves, by
leaving the body with the eaten enemies inside them. For that
purpose, the body can open a special exit - where the
macrophages transport the enemies out as "discharge of
pus".
The same process can become necessary in case of
undigestible foodstuff, like saturated and hardened simple fats
from "junk food". This can happen as many small local
inflammations, known as "acne". Acne is as chronic as
the chronic intake of "junk food" is chronic.
A
chronic inflammation of an organ like the pancreas can be caused
by a pathogenic intestinal flora (e.g. after an antibiotic
medication has destroyed the natural flora), and can be maintained by the bacteria directly, or
indirectly by their poisons they produce in the intestine. If
such a pathogenic intestinal flora is permamently supplied with
unhealthy "junk food" - who could expect that a
chronic inflammation of the pancreas would ever have a chance to
heal up?
[back to the original passage click here] |
Hydrogen
ion concentration: Called "pH", it is a
range of numbers expressing the relative acidity or alkalinity
of a solution. Tha values range from 0 to 14. The pH of an
neutral solution is 7. Acidic solutions have pH values below 7.
Basic (alcaline) solutions have pH values above 7.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Antiphlogistic: Measure
or medication against inflammation.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Antibiotic: Medication
"against life" (of bacteria).
[back to the original passage click here] |
Poisons: =Toxins,
agents that produce a damage to the body. More precise according
to Dr. H. H. Reckeweg: Homotoxins = agents that are toxic to the
human (=homo) body.
[back
to the original passage click here] |
Genes: Genes carry
the genetic code of every living organism. A gene is a segment
of DNA that carries a particular information, e.g. the chemical
information (draft, blueprint, or better to say an original
sample from which the copies are taken), neccessary for
the production of an enzyme or hormon - e.g. of insulin. The
strands of DNA are organized in chromosomes. Each cell of the
body has in its chromosomes the complete information of the
structure, functions and appearance of the complete body.
[back to the original passage click here] |
| Trojan
Horses: In Greek mythology, in the war between the
Greeks and the people of Troy, finally the Greeks used a
stratagem to win the war. They built a large hollow wooden
horse, inside hiding a small group of warriors. The other Greeks
acted as if sailing home. The Trojans, despite warnings, pulled
the horse inside their city walls. At night, the hidden warriors
came out and opened the city walls for the Greeks, and Troy was
destroyed. In a similar way, the viruses are hiding inside the
B-cells and later - using the B-cell's structure and support -
replicate and multiply, to destroy finally the B-cells, using
the body's own defense system for this self-destruction. [back to the original passage click here] |
Docked
with an insulin original:
Imagine there is in a B-cell
on a gene an "insulin original", as the sample from
which the insulin copies are taken. Imagine further: because of
an antibiotic medication, the immune system was impaired during
an acute virus infection. Therefore, viruses could penetrate the
cell membrane and dock with the "insulin original", to
use that fast working production to be replicated also, together
with the insulin.
From that moment on, each produced insulin
molecule is carrying one or several reproduced viruses with it.
It doesn't take long, until the immune system remarks that
something is wrong, that there is a B-cell producing insulin
plus viruses. The immune system will destroy this B-cell. If
there are only some B-cells used in this way by viruses, the
other not infected ones still will be able to produce
sufficiently insulin.
But if most of the B-cells carry viruses
and reproduce them continuously, the immune system will destroy most of the
B-cells, and then the insulin production will become
insufficient. This very probably is the mechanism, how the wrong
treatment of acute infections and inflammations produces
permamently new diabetis of the type I.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Unbiologic:
Un-bio-logic
means "not according to the logic of life". Examples
given:
In case of fever: It would be
un-bio-logic measure to suppress
the fever. Because the body has logic reasons why it has set a
higher temperature (better conditions to succeed against an
aggressor). The bio-logic measure is to support the immune system
in its fight against the aggressor; as soon as the immune system
succeeds in this fight, the body will normalize the body's
temperature by itself.
In
case of hypertension: It would be un-bio-logic to
suppress the higher blood pressure. Because the body has logic
reasons why it has set a higher blood pressure (supply of all
cells and organs with oxygen and energy, despite a narrowed
blood circulation system) The bio-logic measure is, to normalize
the blood circulation system (see the book "Hypertension
Causes & Cure"). As soon as the
blood flow resistance has normalized, the body will normalize
the blood pressure by itself.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Anamnesis: The
history of diseases, symptoms, medications and treatments the
patient had suffered from (respectively received), before the
actual disease and complaints have appeared.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Parulis:
A parulis
is a local inflammation in the upper or lower jaw, mostly caused
by a dead tooth (a tooth in which the "nerve", the
pulpa, has died or has been devitalized by a dentist). The body
remarks that there are tissues which are no longer alive, and
tries to eliminate such a dead tooth. But that's not easy -
because the tooth still is connected to the jaw. Provoked by
some dead protein, that has remained in the small side-branches
of the root canal even despite a dental treatment and root
filling, the immune system sends a part of its army to remove
these "dead body toxins". An inflammation at the tip
of the root develops. Macrophages absorb the toxins and search
for a way to outside. So long as they don't succeed, a heavy
pressure of pus develops inside the jaw, causing unbelievable
heavy pains. Because of the serious situation, more troups of
the defense army are ordered to interfere, who develop a big
"fighting field", with widened access (blood and
lymphatic vessels) to it, and with an endematic swollen, even
hardened environment (= the swollen cheek).
This complete
scenery, including the pains, is diagnosed with one word:
"Parulis". The way out for the pus only can go through
the jaw bone to the surface of the mucosa inside the mouth. The
result is a fistula, a channel through which the macrophages as
pus can leave to outside. As soon as the pus can go out, the
pains reduce, and the swollen cheek slowly normalizes. Such a
tooth must be taken out, as soon as the acute inflammation has
disappeared.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Medical
fault:
As a medical malpractice or professional
blunder should count every measure, that impairs the physical
and mental health of a patient. Objectively, e.g. to suppress a
self-regulation of the body like an elevated temperature or an
elevated blood pressure (instead of supporting the body to get
rid of the causes of such events), is a medical fault.
But under
the legal (forensic) aspect, it's a completely different
situation. There, every measure according to the "ruling
medical doctrine" is regarded as legal, correct and
"arte legis" - even if finally it
results in the exitus (death) of the patient. Even a physician
can be sued for not have carried out such a measure,
because he was personally convinced that it could have impaired the
patient. On the other side, every measure, even if it had saved
the patient's life, can be sued if not "acknowledged"
by the "ruling medical doctrine".
What the
"ruling medical doctrine" has to be, is determined by
"acknowledged" medical representatives, specially
those who have positions in universities or private institutes.
But - who is it who "acknowledges" them? In any case, it'
not a democratic process, nor is it depending on the objectively
documented truth. It's more a matter of power, connections,
research funds, economic and political influences.
After so the
"system of the modern medicine" (whatever and whoever this is)
decides what a medical fault is, a fault could be what could be
a disadvantage for the "system of the modern
medicin", its influence, income, its political and economic
power, rather than a "medical fault" would be what
could be disadvantageous for the patients.
Recently a Swiss physisist, who is a high end computer expert, said to me:
"In a wrong system the right measure is wrong, and the
wrong measure is right!". In a considerable part, the
system of the "modern medicine" must be a
"wrong" system. Because how otherwise it could happen, that the more there is "modern
medicine", the more there are chronic diseases and ill
people?
[back to the original passage click here] |
Leukemia:
A cancer
disease of the hematopoetic (blood-forming) system (bone marrow,
lymphatics, liver, spleen). By an excessive production of white
blood cells (leukocytes), the red blood cells and platelets are
crowded out.
While much research fund is spent to find a cure,
there are no special efforts to find out the causes of leukemia.
But as we know, a main cause are medical treatments and
medications during an acute infection with fever or an acute
inflammation. There are cases of people who died from leukemia,
confirming this medical ("iatrogenic") cause.
The
explanation of the mechanism can be found in the Homotoxicology:
The antibiotic, antiphlogistic medication causes a
"progressive vicariation": = the acute disease, a "reaction phase",
becomes progressively (=progressing deeper into illness)
replaced (= vicariated) by the much more serious
"degeneration phase" (e.g. Diabetes type I) or
"neoplasma phase" (cancer, e.g. leukemia).
[back to the original passage click here] |
Homotoxicology:
It's
a logic evaluation system of diseases, developed by Dr. Hans Heinrich
Reckeweg, that enables the physician to evaluate the diseases
history of the patient (anamnesis), the present status
(diagnosis) and the patient's further fate (prognosis). Also it
supports the selection of the appropriate medication and
treatment measures, and the evaluation of the reactions on the
treatment.
Homotoxicology is based on the principle, that every reaction of
the body has a cause. If the reaction is a disease, the cause
must be a substance that is the opposite of good for the body: A
toxic (poisonous) substance. After toxicity is not only a matter
of the substance, but also a matter of the respective species
(e.g. the deadly nightshade - belladonna - is poisonous for man
- homo sapiens - but healthy food for certain birds), a
definition of toxicity always needs to say "toxic for
whom". Therefore, Reckeweg named substances that are toxic
for man "Homo-Toxins".
To get an overview and logic
order of all
diseases, the Homotoxicology lists all functions, reactions and
diseases of the body up in a table. From left to right, this
table has 6 columns. The first column contains the physiological
functions, and the other columns show step by step more serious
phases of diseases. The column No. 6 contains all types of
cancer. The lines of the table contain from up to down the
different germ-layers of the body and the tissues and organs
belonging to them - from ectoderm to mesoderm down to the
endoderm. If a patient shifts on this table from leftside up
towards rightside down, it means an aggravation. If the patient
moves from rightside down to leftside up on this table, it means
recovery from heavier to lighter disorders.
More about Homotoxicology, and what it means for diabetes type I and II, is
explained in the book " Diabetes
Causes & Cure, including Cure of Later Diabetes Consequences".
[back to the original passage click here] |
Epidemiologist: Medical
expert in epidemiology, the science about incidence of diseases
and their causes, prevention and cure in populations.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Undenaturated:
It
says already a lot that this strange word construction had to be
invented: "Un-de-naturated". More simply could be used
the word "natural". But so many different food
processing methods have been invented (boiling, cooking, baking,
pasteurizing, sterilizing, conserving, bleaching, extracting,
frying, grilling, and now even genetically manipulating), all of them destroying
the original natural alive foodstuffs by de-naturating them,
that their natural state has become the rare exception:
Not denaturated, un-de-naturated! Just a cereal grain as it is -
alive, germinable - natural! Just a carrot as it is - alive,
able to develop new leaves, flowers and seeds - natural! Just a
fresh fruit as it is plucked from the tree!
That we need such a complicated word to describe the original alive state of natural foodstuff,
this demonstrates how far the civilization nutrition has deviated
from the natural origin nutrition of man.
To stop prevent and
cure the consequences - the chronic civilization ailments and
degeneration of offspring - mankind has to stop the de-naturation of
foodstuffs, has to return to un-de-naturated, just simply to
natural, alive foodstuffs.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Genetically frugivorous:
There are different claims what a type
of "eater" ("vorus") man should be. The
claims often depend either on the personal preferences, or on
economic interests. Who is used to eating steaks, will probably claim man to
be an "omnivore"
("an all-and-everything-eater"). E.g. the meat industry
surely will not claim man to be a "vegetarian". Another
example: In the 1960-ties, a university professor, CEO of the
university's nutrition institute, claimed man would need a
daily protein supply of 400 grams of protein - while the World
Food and Agriculture Organization FAO in Rome, at the same time,
claimed a the daily protein supply optimum to be 35 grams
(saying that more, as well as less, are not optimal for human
health)!
The
FAO's experience was based on long-range experience with
hundreds of millions of populations - while the professor's
nutrition institute had got some research work to carry out for
the fish industry!
Objectively
proven, man is genetically determined to
be a "frugivore", a "fruit-eater".
"Fruits" in that context are seeds from grass (e.g.
cereal grains) and
other plants (e.g. pulses), seeds (nuts) and fruits from trees, roots,
and soft leaves. This was the natural origin nutrition of man.
The most
reliable documentation of this fact was presented by the
"Dentitions-Comparing-Anatomy". It was Dr. Richard
Lehne (Hamburg), who developed it. He studied the construction
of dentitions of different mammal species, and compared it with
their natural foodstuffs. He found the dentitions to be
perfectly optimized tools, to comminute the respective foodstuffs
of the species.
Typical "meat eater" (carnivore)
have dentitions the same as lions, dogs, tigers, cats etc.. Their
"molars" are not made to "molar" (=mill,
grind); they are designed as sharp knives, with gaps in between
them, so that no meat
fibres could get stuck there (that's why a lion doesn't need a
toothpick after the meal, as man does, because man's dentition
is not designed for eating meat).
A typical
"all-and-everything-eater" (omnivore) dentition has
the wild boar (looking quite different from the dentition of
man!).
Man's dentition could be proven to be a
"fruit-eater" (frugivore) dentition, by comparing its construction
with the dentition of the frugivores among the primates, our
next relatives in the evolution. This design of man's dentition
is genetically fixed already for hundredthousands of years.
Even
the dentition of the eldest hominid skeleton "Lucy", (found
by Donald Johanson and Tom Gray on the 30th of November, 1974,
at the site of Hadar/Ethiopia, East Africa), who was living
there 3.18 million years ago, was having the
same frugivorous design of her dentition, that the todays's human
population is having too.
Eating a non-man-appropriate food (not
even considering its additional denaturation), is one of the
main causes of the civilization ailments - including diabetes.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Plant-based: Plant-based
foodstuff is food consisiting of plants, fruits and seeds that
have grown and ripened on plants. A plant-based nutrition is not
based on animals (meat, fish) or their products (eggs, milk
etc.).
[back to the original passage click here] |
Bio-medical
measures: Measures that support the natural efforts
of the body to maintain or restore health. There are plenty of
methods and medications that can be used: Herbal medicine,
homeopathy, acupuncture, electro-acupuncture, massage methods,
bowel irrigation, exercises, sports, sun exposure, bathing and
swimming in the oceans's water (from where all life has its
origin), etc. etc. ...
[back to the original passage click here] |
Homeopathy:
It was Dr. Samuel Hahnemann, who found an inconsistency when
studying pharmacology. There was written: Quinine causes fever.
Also was there written: Quinine cures fever. He was thinking:
"Either the one, or the other - or could it depend on the
dosage?"
Dr. Hahnemann started experiments on himself with different
dilutions (concentrations) of quinine. In fact, when using it
more concentrated, it caused fever. When using higher dilutions
of quinine, the fever disappeared. This caused him to try other
substances too (drugs, plant extracts etc.), and he found a
principle: In higher concentration, a substance causes a very
special picture of symtoms, that is typical for this substance.
Other substances have other pictures of symptoms. Then, based on
his quinine experience, he had another idea: If a patient has a
similar picture of symptoms as one of the examined substance
produced, why not to try what happens if giving this substance
in a higher dilution to the patient? In fact, he found in many
cases a surprising curing effect of this method. He formulated
the principle he had found as follows (in Latin): "Similia
similibus curantur!" Expressed and explained in English: If
a patient has a picture of symptoms that are similar to the
picture of symptoms produced by a substance if taken in higher
concentration, the same substance often cures the patient's
similar symptoms, if given to him in a higher dilution.
The method for diluting was this: First
he produced a concentrated, saturated solution of the substance.
This he called the "original tinctur" of this
substance. This he put in a medicine bottle. Then he took a new
medicine bottle, and filled into it 1 part of the "original
tincture", and 9 parts of the solvent (e.g. a 30 % alcohol
solvent; for injection purposes a physiological salt solution;
the same principle also works with not liquid substances like
lactose or even fine clay). He found it to be important to add
some energy to produce the curing effect of the dilution: If the
mixture is liquid, to shake it 10 times intensively from up to
down; in case of a solid mixture, intensively to triturate it in
a mortar. This processing he called "Potentiating".
The first dilution he named with the
name of the substance plus "D1" (saying "Decimal
One" = 0.1) behind the name. It is the "Potency
D1" of the substance. From this "D1" he took (in
another new bottle) again 1 part, added 9 parts, shook it
intensively and named it "D2" (saying "Decimal
Two = 0.01). He found, that many substances still produce
symptoms even when given D4 or D5, and starting their curing
effects from e.g. D6.
Even in higher potencies he found curing
effects. Therefore he started other experiments, in dilutioning
steps of 1:99, calling it "Centesimal Potencies": C1 =
0.01; C2 = 0.0001; C3 = 0.000001 etc.. One of the strange
findings was, that from very high potencies, like C100,
sometimes one single intake was sufficient to cure a chronic
complaint of the patient.
In such high dilutions there doesn't
remain a single molecule of the original substance remains. This
was a welcome argument for the representatives of the
"acknowledged medical doctrine", to name homeopathy as
"nonsense", and the homeopathic physicians as
"charlatans" or "quacks". If they would have
been wise, they better would have kept quiet. It's never good to
open the mouth about a matter without having own practical
experience with it. "Si tacuisses, philosophus
mansisses", the old Romans said already 2 more than 2
milliniums ago - says: "If you would have kept quiet, you
would have remained a philosopher". Because, new studies
found out, that substances are able to arrange their molecules
in certain structures, that contain information the substance
has received. Water e.g. forms certain "clusters" of
water molecules, that contain information from substances, even
if the substances themselves are no more there. This is one of
the findings why even higher dilutions of homeopathic
medication are effectful. That they are effectful, is
proven by an uncountable number of cured patents, and can be
found again in most cases, if properly and precisely applied.
That homeopathy only works if properly and precisely done,
already Dr. Samuel Hahnemann had found out. Therefore he said to
his students (medical doctors who learned homeopathy from him):
"Copy it - but copy it precisely!" (The same I say to
those who use my nutritional findings and recommendations to
recover from chronic diseases).
.... In fact .... The
method he used for diluting was this: .... He found this ....
Then he started experiments with other substances, drugs,
extracts ... colleagues cooperated .... drug examinations ...
even if the dilutions were so high that not one single molecule
of the substance was in it, still there were pharmacological
efficacy found ... this made others to declare it for irreal or
nonsense ... it took op to only a few years ago, that the cause
was found why even high solutions are effective: The structure
information of the original substance transferres by the
dilution method (potenzieren) on the compositions of the water
molecules in "clusters" - the water itself now carries
the information, as a magnetic tape carries the information
spoken into a microphone and fixed there by the certain
determined positions of the magnetic particles ... Some examples
shall be given of the efficacy ...
[back to the original passage click here]
|
Suppressive methods:
There
is a lot of suppression and "anti...-"measures in
modern medicine. Fever? Antifebrile suppression. Inflammation?
Antiphlogistic suppression. If the consequence of such
unbiological treatment is allergy? Antihistaminica for
suppression of the allergy. If the auto-immune-system becomes
active: Auto-immune-suppression. If the blood sugar level
elevates: Suppression by insulin. If cancer develops: General
suppression of the natural cell division, not only of the
division of cancer cells. Elevation of the blood pressure
(hypertension)? Suppression by medication of
"antihypertensiva". But - if one of the side-effects
of "antihypertensive" medication is impotency? Can
impotency be cured by suppressing it??
The "modern
medicine" and their representatives believe, if once they
succeed to fight down all diseases in the patient and in the
population, the remaining result should be health (their
diagnosis of health: "findings negative"). This is
their theory, this is the basis of their doctrine, of their
treatments and of their medications.
Unfortunately in the
reality, after all their "heroic" fights against
diseases, often even the patient him- or herself isn't remaining,
having been finished together with the diseases.
But in this case,
again suppressive methods are applied: If any physician would
dare to mention or even publish this fact, the "medical
establishment" would suppress his opinion, apply censorship
if he would offer his article to a medical journal to publish
it, and would probably finish him economically, in his
reputation and mentally (there are more than a few examples in
history of medicine for that). [back to the original passage click here] |
Side-effects:
A
doctrine of "modern medicine" says: "If a drug
has effect, it has also unwanted side-effects. If no
side-effects, no effect at all. It's a matter of weighting, to
put up with the unwanted side-effects in with the wanted main
effect."
In truth, only those drugs have unwanted
side-effects, which are designed from an unbioligical point of
view, e.g. "The body is wrong reacting like this, therefore
we have to interfere", or
"man is an imperfect creation, now we (the "modern
medicine") come and improve and correct what has been
created wrong".
Most of the bio-logical treatments and
medications do not have unwanted side effects, despite
their wanted main effects often are more powerful and effective
than all those un-bio-logically designed medication and drugs
could be.
In addition, after a disease has been cured with
bio-medical methods, there is no time of convalescense needed (because
the patient doesn't need to recover from unwanted side-effects
of an unbiological treatment).
[back to the original passage click here] |
Allopathic
medication: The word "allopathy" was
created by Dr. Samuel Hahnemann, the discoverer of the
homeopathy. The word characterizes all medical methods and drugs
that are opposite to the homeopathic therapy and medicines.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Acupuncture: A
technique of traditional Chinese medicine. Its application needs
the knowledge of special location points in the skin, where nerval
connections lead to organs of the body. Described in another
way: Every organ has special points in the skin, from where you
can influence the energy situation and energy flow of the organ,
by putting fine silver or gold needles into such points. It's a
very elegant medical method, optimized for several thousands of
years in China. In many cases it cures faster than any other
method, and it has no unwanted side-effects. (Negative
statements about acupuncture are only released from
"experts" that never had the knowledge and practical
experience to treat with acupuncture - in this aspect it's the
same with homeopathy).
[back to the original passage click here] |
Electro-acupuncture: It
was Dr. Reinhard Voll, Plochingen, Germany, who had studied
acupuncture, and one day said to himself: If it's possible to
influence organs by treating certain points on the skin by
putting needles - perhaps it's too possible to measure something
at these points? He started to measure and study the electric
resistance of these acupunture points in the skin, and compared
it with the findings in the patient. Soon he found this: If the
organ is normal and healthy, there is a certain medium electric
resistance. If the organ is ill, there is a deviation of the
electric resistance of its acupunture point in the skin. Based
on this discovery, Dr. Voll could develop a complete system of
diagnosis and treatment, the "Electro-Acupuncture".
Many physicians around the globe use this very successfully. As
other bio-medical methods, electro-acupuncture doesn't have any
unwanted side-effects.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Plant
extract (herbal) medicine:
Herbal medicine exists
longer than man. Already before man appeared on earth, other mammals discovered how helpful
certain herbs can be in case of certain complaints. Even they know
which herbs to take to cure a certain pain or ache.
Man has transferred and optimized the knowlege of herbal and plant
extract medicine for thousands of generations. Still, part of
this knowledge can be found in South America, Africa, China and
India.
Only the so-called
"modern medicine" acted as proud as ignorant,
declaring all this traditional knowledge for nonsense. Now,
after most of this knowledge has been lost, they partially
remark that there are substances of high efficacy in some
unknown plants. But instead of using the plants or a plant
extract directly, what would be as efffectful as cheap, now the
millions from funds are pumped into research, to find the single
effective substance, to produce it artificially, and to bring a
new expensive drug into the market.
This ignores the fact, that
the natural synergy of components in the plant is much more
effectful than an isolated stuff - however it brings much more
earnings and a higher shareholder value than e.g. a simple herb
tea or an alcohol extract of the plant.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Fasting:
By nature,
the body of man is designed to store what could be "out of
stock" for some time; the longer this could happen with a
stuff, the longer the body can store it (air, that's everywhere,
only for minutes; water, that's sometimes not there, for some
hours; food, that can be out until a next harvest or needs to
walk a long distance to find it, for weeks). This is a result of
evolution, of optimizing man to survive in a natural
environment.
In times of food deficiency, Air to breath and
water to drink could be sufficient to survive for weeks without
much food. Such times, at the same time, were natural
"fasting times" - the body could consume everything
that was stored, and by that clean up the organs and tissues
from everything not needed to survive. Nowadays, in most of the
countries for most people, there isn't any time of food
deficiency. But the ability to store still is there. By the
time, the storing places e.g. in the connective tissues become
overfilled, people increase their weight, and even vital
functions (e.g. the blood circulation) become affected by
storage of protein and fat in the walls of the cardiovascular
system.
Therefore, certain periods of fasting - total fasting or
restricted food intake - are useful to clean up the body from
"expired storage". Several religions too recommend
fasting periods to their people, similar as other hygienic and
health advice (like frequent washing of the feet) is found in
religious recommendations.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Amputation: Removal
of a limb or another body part by operation.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Gangrene: Mumification
or fouling decomposition of tissues that have died because of
interruption of the blood supply. Gangrene in the toes, feet and
legs often is one of the "later consequences" of
diabetes (or of the oversupply with protein by the diabetic
diet). The common medical recommendation is an amputation. E.g.
in Germany, during the last 2 decades about 800,000 legs of
diabetic patients have been amputated. This fact and numbers
reveal it as a lie, to tell to the patients this would be
prevented by taking regularly the right dosages of the
medication. At the same time, as demonstrated in the book "Diabetes
Causes and Cure, including Later Diabetes Consequences",
most of such amputations could be avoided, if in time the common
diabetes diet is given up and replaced by a natural, healthy,
man-appropriate "civilized origin nutrition".
[back to the original passage click here] |
Retina: The
background of the eye, on which the picture by the eye's optical
system is projected, and transformed into the nerve signals sent
to the brain, where the picture is perceived. The retina has
many very fine blood capillaries. In case of protein oversupply,
a narrowing of capillaries can happen, forcing the organism fo
form new capillaries, to maintain the blood supply of the
eyeground. These new capillaries are not so solid, and easily some of them can become defect, with the consequence of
bleedings in the eyeground. Such bleedings are the main cause of
blindness, and 80 % of blind people are diabetics who have lost
their eyeside in this way - less because of diabetes, more
because of the protein oversupply with the common diabetic diet.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Dialysis: Another
consequence of an oversupply with protein is a thickening of the
filter membranes of the kidneys, and a reduced blood circulation
because of narrowed capillaries. At last, the kidneys can't
longer filtrate the blood. The patient would die, if not twice
per week a dialysis ("washing of the blood") of
several hours would be carried out. The increase of kidney
failure cases, especially in diabetes patients, is alarming -
for the patients, but not so much for the industry supplying
with the materials, chemicals and equipments needed for
dialysis: Their shareholder values are within the best and most
succesful ones - worldwide.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Varicose Oesophagus: It's a chain of events with an often
deadly ending. First, the diabetic patient's liver degenerates (hepatopathia
diabetica). A liver cirrhosis develops, causing a
shrinkage and hardening of the liver's tissues, and by that
causing a congestion in the portal vein. Therefore, the veins in
the oesophagus - the channel through which the food goes from
the mouth into the stomach - become varicose. If such a vein
breaks, the patient can die from an unremarked inner bleeding.
It's again not true that this chain of events could be prevented
by a right dosage of tablets or insulin. There are more chances
of prevention by more health, and the most important basis of
health is a healthy, natural, man-appropriate nutrition.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Heart
attack:
It happens, if one of the heart's coronary
blood vessels obliterate (close) completely, either by an
embolic coagulation of the blood or by an increasing narrowing,
caused by protein oversupply and its storage in the basal
membrane of the blood vessels and capillaries.
Nowadays,
medicine tries to prevent this by a
"bypass"-operation: a piece of a vein is taken from a
leg and transplanted into the heart, and there connected with
the respective narrowed vessel before and after the narrowed
place, to "bypass" it. Such an operation on the living
heart is a heavy operation. Despite often, after some time, the new
blood vessel again narrows (because the same wrong nutrition,
"rich in protein and low in calories" is recommended
and continued). A second and a third "bypass"-operation
is done - not always the patient survives it.
If the patient
survives the bypass-operations, another risk develops: The leg, from where the
veins have been taken, therefore only has a reduced blood
circulation. Especially in the diabetic patient, the risk of
diabetic gangrene in this leg increases considerably.
A much
more bio-logic method would be, to change the nutrition from an oversupply with protein to a healthy, natural, man-appropriate
nutrition (sorry that I have to insist, but it's the only
true way out of the avalanche of catastrophic, often deadly
events). Without any operation, this nutrition (eventually
supported by a series of 8-10 small blood lettings of 80-100
milliliters, done by the physician once per week, as described
in my book "Hypertension Causes & Cure) makes the
storage in the basal membrane of the coronary blood vessels
melting off, the blood itself reaches a lower viscosity (becomes
thinner, more liquid), and the blood coagulation tendency
reduces.
By that, on a much less risky and much safer way, the
patient leaves the cardiovascular risk zone for good. At the
same time, the general health condition of the patient improves
fundamentally.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Stroke: A
"stroke" happens, if one of the brain's blood vessels obliterate (close) completely, either by an
embolic coagulation of the blood or by an increasing narrowing,
caused by protein oversupply and its storage in the basal
membrane of the blood vessels and capillaries. A part of the
brain, no longer supplied by the blood stream, dies. The
consequences are different, even can be deadly, depending on the
affected brain area. In case of survival, e.g. on side of the
body can be completely or partially paralysed. The remaining
part of the brain tries to take over the lost functions, so a
partial or nearly complete recovery is possible. As a
prevention, there is no "bypass"-operation possible.
The only effective prevention is to keep the cardiovascular
system functional by a healthy, natural, man-appropriate
nutrition, as already explained before and described in all
practical details in the book "Schnitzer
Intensive Nutrition, Schnitzer Normal Nutrition".
[back to the original passage click here] |
Embolism:
An
embolus is a coagulation of the blood inside a blood vessel,
closing it completely and disconnecting the area supplied before
by the blood stream, so this area must die.
In a healthy body, the
coagulation of blood has the only task to stop a loss of blood
in case of an injury. As soon as the loss of blood is stopped, the
embolus inside the hurt blood vessel dissolves, and the blood
supply of the tissues continues. This is possible, because in a
healthy body the coagulation tendency and the de-coagulation
ability are in a balance.
In case of an oversupply with protein,
as usually recommended for several different diets for different
purposes, the coagulation-decoagulation balance shifts to the side of
coagulation. Now, the blood easily coagulates, but it's more
difficult for the body to re-dissolve the coagulated blood.
The
coagulation always is triggered by rough surfaces, as it happens
in case of a wound, injury, hurt; and also if the blood flow
gets slowed down or completely stopped, as is the case on the
surface of a wound. The purpose is to cover the wound by a
natural patch, under which the healing process is protected.
But
in case of protein oversupply, where some of the protein is
stored in the basal membranes of the cardiovascular system, the
inner surface of the blood vessels becomes uneven and rough in
some places - and there easily a coagulation can be triggered,
forming an embolus and closing the blood vessel.
This oversupply
of protein also slows down the velocity of the blood stream in
the capillaries, by narrowing them, and elevating the
viscosity of the blood (thickening the blood). In the University
of Homburg/Saar, Germany, this blood stream velocity was
measured in healthypeople and in young diabetics. They used a special
microscope, to watch the blood stream velocity in the
capillaries under the finger nails, and recorded it by video. A
huge difference was found of about 14:1. To give a picture by
comparing speeds in traffic: If the "healthy speed"
would be 70 miles per hour, the "diabetic speed" would
be 5.0 miles per hour. It's not difficult to understand, to
which danger of embolism diabetics are exposed by the usual
diabetic diet, containing an oversupply with protein.
[back to the original passage click here] |
The
usual diabetic diet:
The composition of the usual
diabetic diet is based on a too much superficial idea of the
disease: "The body is handicapped in processing
carbohydrates. So we reduce them in the patient's nutrition. By
what can we replace the carbohydrates? Adding fat wouldn't
be good, what can we do? More protein is the only solution
..."
The fundamental mistake was, not to go deep enough into the
questions why the patient is handicapped in processing
carbohydrates. The medical system was satisfied to have found
medicines that can be produced, sold and permanently applied:
Insulin for diabetes type I, sulphonyl urea for diabetes type
II. Especially the permanent need of as many as possible chronic
patients is interesting from an economic point of view.
Therefore, huge research capital was and still is pumped into
studies and developments to improve the mass production e.g. of
insulin. Even genetic manipulations of animals are tried, to
cause them to produce human insulin.
In a sharp contrast, not
any fund is spent to go deeper into the questions about
diabetes: Why does the diabetic I have a decreasing one's
own
insulin production, which event or measure caused the
auto immune system to turn against its own organ and cells? Why
are the insulin receptors of diabetics II less functional? What
are the long-term-effects of a diet rich in protein? Are
there alternatives?
In truth, this diabetic diet
reinforces the main cause of diabetes II: a protein oversupply. This
protein oversupply in the nowaday's civilization feeding habits
already is the cause, why such a high percentage of the
population is ill from diabetes type II. Giving the cause of the
disease as a reinforced diet, makes the disease incurable. From
an economic point of view, this might be understandable. But to
where have the ethic aspects disappeared?
Résumé:
The usual diabetic
diet, with its high content of protein, is a main cause of
diabetes II and of its "incurability", and the usual
diabetic diet with its high content of protein is a main cause
of the serious "later consequences" of diabetes I and
diabetes II. More about, and what the alternatives are, can be
found in the book "Diabetes
Causes & Cure, including the Later Diabetes Consequences".
[back to the original passage click here] |
Civilized
origin nutrition: Man's genetic programming
determines man to be a frugivore. The most convincing,
irrefutable evidence has been presented by Dr. Richard Lehne.
With his "Comparing Dentition Anatomy" he could
demonstrate the dentitions of all mammals to be very specialized
and optimized tools to comminute the origin food of the
respective species. By comparing other mammal's dentitions, that
are most similar to man's dentition, with the known origin
foodstuffs of such mammals, Dr. Lehne could diagnose man without
any doubt as a frugivore. Man's origin nutrition was composed of
seeds from trees and plants (e.g. grass seeds), fruits, roots
and soft leaves. To enable the today's populations to return to
a natural nutrition and by that to prevent and cure the chronic
civilization diseases caused by the denaturated civilization
nutrition, I developed from 1963 to 1975 a "Civilized
Origin Nutrition", using for it the agriculural and
gardening food crops and fruits man has developed from the
original wild food plants, and published it in 1975 in the book
"Schnitzer
Intensive Nutrition, Schnitzer Normal Nutrition"
[back to the original passage click here] |
Slowly
resorbable carbohydrates: The dosages or sulphonyl
urea or insulin are mainly determined by the peaks of the blood
sugar level. Fast resorbable carbohydrates like sugar and
refined flours (and products containing them) cause high peaks
of the blood sugar level. Wholemeal cereal foodstuff and meals,
especially if prepared from germinable, freshly ground cereal
grains and eaten raw as muesli preparations, are slowly resorbed, maintaining a well balanced supply for several hours.
Therefore, when changing to this natural nutrition, in the first
hours and days the blood sugar level should be measured more
often. Because mostly, already during the first hours and days,
the dosages can (must) be reduced considerably, in average by
about 30 %, as the practical experience is.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Frugivore: Concerning
the original food base of mammals, they are ordered in different
classes, as "Herbivore" (Grass/pant-eaters),
"Carnivore" (meat-eater), "Omnivore"
(all-and-everything-eater), and "Frugivore"
(fruit-eater). If man would be an "Onmivore", as many
people claim by different reasons, man's dentition should be
constructed similar to the wild boar's dentition. Obviously
man's dentition doesn't look like that, nor like a Carnivore's
dentition.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Cellular
therapy:
Therapy with living cells from another
organism. In the beginning were experiments with organ
transplantations from primates, carried out by Prof. Woronoff,
who lived in the South of France. One of the problems was, that
diseases were transferred also by that from the primates, e.g. Syphilis.
One of
Woronoffs students was Dr. Paul Niehans, who lived in Vevey,
Switzerland. Once, in an acute case, where during a thyroid
operation the parathyroid gland was affected (it regulates the
calcium management of the body), there was no time to prepare an
organ transplantation; the patient would have died within few
hours by the deregulation of the calcium level. So Dr.
Niehans took a parathyroid grand from a young animal, and in a
sterile glass plate he cut it into very small pieces with an
operation scalpell, filled it in a syringe and injected it into
the gluaeus maximus (gluteal muscle) of the patient. The patient
was saved by that for good.
By this experience, Dr. Niehans
discovered that it's not necessary to transplant an organ; it's
in even a better way and more effectful, to inject a solution with
embryonal living cells, even mixed from different organs, into
the gluteal muscle. Dr. Niehans worked with cells from sheep
embryos; the sheep were kept in a very natural environment in
the mountains behind Vevey. Many famous people of his time became the
patients of Dr. Niehans, presidents, chancellors, the pope Pius
XII, managers, and many "normal" patients from all
over the world.
It's not clear to me, why
these experiences of
Prof. Woronoff and Dr. Niehans are widely ignored, even fought
down and discriminated, while the "modern medicine"
again starts from the beginning, transplanting organs, with all
disadvantages like the autoimmune reactions of the body against
the transplanted organ - while Dr. Niehans had solved this problem. He didn't need any "autoimmune-suppressive"
medication - in the opposite, his cellular therapy improved the
capacities of the auto-immune system of his patients
considerably.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Stem
cells: Stem cells are the status of cells shortly
after the fertilization of the ovo. They are
"omnipotent", they can develop to every type of
specialized cells, e.g. brain cells as well as liver cells, or
B-cells for the pancreas. In the developing embryo, still there
are unspecialized stem cells. They are found in the umbilical
cord, and even the adult organism has stem cells. Presently,
there are research efforts to find ways using stem cells for
therapies of incurable diseases. There are hopeful results as
well as heavy "ethical objections" against the
application. There are real chances to cure diabetes type I with
this therapy. Naturally, if most chronic ailments would become
curable, it would be a success for the patients and the few
doctors who do such treatments - and a "Black Friday"
for all others, who hithertoo earned their income from the
incurability of those diseases.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Endemic
growth: The increase in percentage of a certain
disease in a population.
[back to the original passage click here] |
Diabetic morbidity: The
percentage of people in a population being ill from diabetes (morbus=disease).
[back to the original passage click here] |
Targeted
disinformation:
This is a strategy to draw the
people's attention away from a truth that is wanted to hide, or
to destroy a person's reputation so the people stop believing what this person is publishing or doing. It was developed in East
Europe during the "Cold War" after Worldwar II. After
that, the method was adopted by many pressure groups to defend
their political and economic interests. A book could be filled
with examples.
One example shall be given here,
that's directly concerning diabetes: It was in 1977, that I was asked for
advice in a desperate case of diabetes: The hospital urgently
advised to amputate the patient's leg because of diabetic
gangrene, but the patient said "No!". His family took
him home. After having been asked to help, I recommended to take a
strictly and completely raw, plant-based nutrition, without any
animal food component, including no drop of milk. The
controlling doctor stated
after only a few days: "Amputation no longer needed, blood
circulation improving."
The gangrenic ulcer healed up
within some weeks, and - surprisingly - the diabetes was cured
after a few months completely, while the hospital's doctors had
stated that, because of aggravation of the diabetes, sulfonyl
urea should be replaced by insulin injections.
In 1978, I
published the case, expecting other doctors would ask me how
we did it, to learn from it and hopefully to cure their diabetic
patients also. Only one single doctor asked and tried it: His
great curing results you find on this page in a table (Dr.
Helmut Weiss).
At the same time, this was the point, when
"targeted disinformation" was used against the new
therapy: A medical professor, known as
"diabetologist", and being the editor of a diabetes
journal for diabetic patients, aggressed me heavily in its
editoral, warning from this new healthy nutrition and
threatening with "legal consequences" against me. At
the same time, he caused a friend of him in the German
Government's Health Office in Berlin, to warn all Health Offices
of all German districts from this new diet.
And now read
carefully the targeted disinformation that was sent out:
"This diet could be harmful to diabetics, because it could
cause a dangerous hypoglycemia". You, as a diabetic patient
yourself or knowing the disease at least, can read even out of that
disinformation the truth: "This diet is so effectful in
lowering the blood sugar level in diabetics, that maintaining
the same dosage of sulfonyl urea or insulin could cause a
hypoglycemia (a too low blood sugar level)".
So, by the
covering the truth with a smoke of misleading words, a
"warning" was spread, to hinder patients to improve
their health. Because if less insulin needed, it's an economic
disadvantage for those who produce and sell it. This is a
perfect example of "targeted disinformation"!
After
this, I even offered to this professor to re-evaluate by himself
the
efficacy of this healthy nutrition in improving the diabetic
patient's health; I offered to inform him about all details of
my experience and of this "diet" (=natural healthy
nutrition). He refused, giving the following reason:
"Finally we have a different opinion about diabetes."
Why did he not take the chance to "finish" me
scientificly, by proving hopefully that this "diet"
wouldn't work? Was he afraid that the truth and his error would
be revealed, if accepting my offer of a study in his diabetes
clinic?
Another example: Recently, I visited a Diabetes Newsgroup on the
Internet. The poor information given to the diabetic patients
touched me. I gave a short info about my first experience with
this disease, describing this case where it was possible to
avoid the amputation and even later to cure the diabetes. About
5-6 people responded - in a very aggressive, malicious,
insulting way, like having to defend a valuable property (the
disease) against somebody who tries to bring health. Calmfully I
responded with a final statement. Shortly after that, my
provider warned me because of "Spam", threatening to
close my complete Internet site in case of repetition.
Investigations brought out, that those people are using a hidden
code in their comments, that automatically reports everybody to
a "Spam office" who responds to their insulting
comments. And such comments of them to other people who tried to
put reasonable information on the diabetes newsgroup were found
too. Also a certain connection to some big chemical industry in the
background was found ...
[back to the original passage click here] |
| More explanation needed? A lot more
information, and all practical Know How needed to use this
knowledge practically, can be found in the book "Diabetes
Causes & Cure, Including the Later Diabetes Consequences". |
|
